color graphic without text
Using This Checklist

The purpose of this checklist is to help you analyze Sponsor-offered clauses in order to determine what editing they require to bring them into conformance with the Regents' Rules regarding intellectual property. If you have not yet offered the Sponsor a standard agreement, or if that is not acceptable to the Sponsor, our standard clauses as substitutes for particular Sponsor-offered clauses, you should do that first before attempting to edit Sponsor-offered clauses.

Each section below summarizes the important features or concepts to look for (or in some cases, to avoid) as you analyze a contract clause that is not one of our standards or otherwise already approved. Review each section to determine whether the clause you are analyzing conforms with our requirements. If you note a discrepancy, refer to the hyperlinked clauses for help. If there are numerous problems with a clause, try to substitute one of our standards rather than attempt extensive editing.

horizontal rule

Publication

Please see our Publication Checklist Interactive Form for assistance in the analysis of publication clauses offered by Sponsors.

horizontal rule

Confidentiality

Please see our Confidentiality Checklist Interactive Form for assistance in the analysis of confidentiality clauses offered by Sponsors.

horizontal rule

Intellectual Property

Please see our Intellectual Property Checklist Interactive Form for assistance in the analysis of intellectual property clauses offered by Sponsors.

horizontal rule

Indemnification

Please see our Indemnification Checklist Interactive Form for assistance in the analysis of indemnification clauses offered by Sponsors.

horizontal rule

Third Party Agreements

As with all Agreements, Check the Parties

Indemnification

Universal with the Sponsor

horizontal rule

Database License Agreements

Please see our Dabatase License Checklist Interactive Form for assistance in the analysis of database license terms and conditions.

horizontal rule

Cross-Referencing the Right to Publish

[Generally, it is best if the results of the Study are not included in what is defined or referred to as confidential information. If Sponsor-offered clauses contain language that produces such a result, edit such clauses to delete references to the results of the Study. If Sponsor insists that the results of the Study be considered confidential information or that Sponsor will own the study data, you should insert a cross-reference to our right to publish: "Subject to Institution's right to publish the results of the Study as set forth in Section ___, . . ."]

If Sponsor Considers Data or Results To Be Confidential Information

Institution shall not disclose or use for any purpose other than performance of the Study any and all trade secrets, privileged records or other confidential or proprietary information disclosed to or, subject to the right of Institution to publish the results of the Study, as set forth in Section ___ above, developed by the Institution pursuant to this Agreement ("Confidential Information") ...

horizontal rule

If Sponsor Wants to Own Data

Written summaries of all data from the Study will be transmitted to Sponsor as generated and promptly at the completion of the program in a final written report. Sponsor owns these data, subject to the right of Institution to publish the results of the study, as set forth in Section ___ above, and may use the information generated hereunder for its business goals; for example, in support of the prosecution of Sponsor patent applications and in support and any IND and NDA.

horizontal rule

Intellectual Property Section Homepage
| Standard Agreements
Material Transfer Agreements Checklist

horizontal rule

August 9, 2001
University of Texas System Office of General Counsel
Comments to intellectualproperty@utsystem.edu

horizontal rule