Purpose:
To govern the use of interest rate swap transactions
Date Approved:
February
13, 2003
Background:
The
Board adopted the U. T. System Interest Rate Swap Policy to govern the use
by The University of Texas System of interest rate swap transactions for the
purpose of either reducing the cost of existing or planned Revenue Financing
System debt, or to hedge the interest rate of existing or planned Revenue
Financing System debt.
I. Authority
State law authorizes
the U. T. System (System) to enter into interest rate swap transactions
and related agreements (Chapter 55 of the Texas Education Code and Chapter
1371 of the Texas Government Code). Pursuant
to this authority, the U. T. Board of Regents (Board) approved the Eighth
Supplemental Resolution to the Master Resolution, authorizing the System to
enter into Master Swap Agreements with certain counterparties, in 1999.
II. Purpose
This policy
will govern the use by the System of interest rate swap transactions for the
purpose of either reducing the cost of existing or planned Revenue Financing
System debt, or to hedge the interest rate of existing or planned Revenue
Financing System debt. By using swaps
in a prudent manner, the System can take advantage of market opportunities to
reduce costs and reduce interest rate risk. The use of swaps must be tied directly to System debt instruments. The System shall not enter into swap
transactions for speculative purposes.
III. Legality/Approval
To enter
into a Master Swap Agreement (which governs each swap transaction), the System
must receive: 1) approval from the
Board; 2) approval by the Texas Attorney General, 3) approval from the
Texas Bond Review Board, and 4) an opinion acceptable to the Authorized
Representative from bond counsel that the agreement relating to the swap
transaction is a legal, valid, and binding obligation of the System and that
entering into the transaction complies with applicable State and federal laws.
IV. Form of Swap Agreements
Each new Master
Swap Agreement shall contain terms and conditions as set forth in the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) Master Agreement, as amended,
and such other terms and conditions including schedules and confirmations
as deemed necessary by an Authorized Representative.
V. Methods of Soliciting and Procuring Swaps
Swaps can be
procured via competitive bids or on a negotiated basis. The competitive bid should include a minimum
of three firms with counterparty credit ratings of ‘A’ or ‘A2’ or better from
Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s, respectively. An Authorized Representative may allow a firm or firms not
submitting the bid that produces the lowest cost to match the lowest bid and be
awarded up to 40% of the notional amount of the swap transaction.
An
Authorized Representative may procure swaps by negotiated methods in the
following situations:
1. A determination is made by
an Authorized Representative that due to the complexity of a particular
transaction, a negotiated bid would result in the most favorable pricing.
2. An Authorized Representative
makes a determination that, in light of the facts and circumstances, doing so
will promote the System’s interests by encouraging and rewarding innovation.
VI. Management of Swap Transaction Risk
Certain
risks are created when the System enters into any swap transaction. In order to manage the associated risks,
guidelines and parameters for each risk category are as follows:
Counterparty
Credit Risk
To limit and
diversify the System’s counterparty risk and to monitor credit exposure to each
counterparty, the System may not enter into a swap transaction with an
otherwise qualified counterparty unless the cumulative mark-to-market value
owed by the counterparty (and its unconditional guarantor, if applicable) to
the System shall be less than or equal to $30 million.
The $30
million limitation shall be the sum of all mark-to-market values between the
subject counterparty and the System regardless of the type of swap transaction,
net of collateral posted by the counterparty. Collateral will consist of cash, U. S. Treasury securities, and
Federal Agency securities guaranteed unconditionally by the full faith and
credit of the U. S. Government. Collateral shall be deposited with a third party trustee acceptable to
System, or as mutually agreed upon between System and each counterparty.
Specific
limits by counterparty are based on the cumulative mark-to-market value of the
swap(s) and the credit rating of the counterparty. The limits are as follows:
Counterparty
Long-Term Debt Rating
(lowest
prevailing rating from
Standard
& Poor’s / Moody’s)
|
Maximum
Cumulative Mark-to-Market Value of Swaps Owed to System by Counterparty
(net
of collateral posted)
|
AAA
/ Aaa
|
$30
million
|
AA+
/ Aa1
|
$25
million
|
AA
/ Aa2
|
$20
million
|
AA-
/ Aa3
|
$15
million
|
A+
/ A1
|
$10
million
|
A
/ A2
|
$5
million
|
If a
counterparty’s credit rating is downgraded such that the cumulative
mark-to-market value of all swaps between a counterparty and the System exceeds
the maximum permitted by this policy, the counterparty must either terminate a
portion of the swap, post collateral, or provide other credit enhancement that
is satisfactory to the System and ensures compliance with this policy.
Termination
Risk
The System
shall consider the merits of including a provision that permits it to
optionally terminate a swap agreement at any time over the term of the
agreement (elective termination right). In general, exercising the right to optionally terminate an agreement
should produce a benefit to the System, either through receipt of a payment
from a termination, or if a termination payment is made by the System, a
conversion to a more beneficial debt instrument or credit relationship. If no other remedies are available, it is
possible that a termination payment by the System may be required in the event
of termination of a swap agreement due to a counterparty default or following a
decrease in credit rating.
Amortization
Risk
The amortization
schedules of the debt and associated swap transaction should be closely matched
for the duration of the swap. Mismatched amortization schedules can result in a less than satisfactory
hedge and create unnecessary risk. In
no circumstance may the term of a swap transaction extend beyond the final
maturity date of the affected debt instrument, or in the case of a refunding
transaction, beyond the final maturity date of the refunding bonds.
Basis
(Index) Risk
Basis risk
arises as a result of movement in the underlying variable rate indices that
may not be in tandem, creating a cost differential that could result in a
net cash outflow from the System. Basis
risk can also result from the use of floating, but different, indices. To mitigate basis risk, any index used as part
of an interest rate swap agreement shall be a recognized market index, including
but not limited to the Bond Market Association Municipal Swap Index (BMA)
or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
Tax
Risk
Tax risk is
the risk that tax laws will change, resulting in a change in the marginal tax
rates on swaps and their underlying assets. Tax risk is also present in all tax-exempt debt issuances. The Office of Finance will need to
understand and document tax risk for a contemplated swap transaction as part of
the approval process.
VII. Reporting Requirements
The Annual
Financial Report prepared by the System and presented to the Board will discuss
the status of all interest rate swaps. The report shall include a list of all swaps with notional value and
interest rates, a list of counterparties and their respective credit ratings,
and other key terms.
VIII. Definitions
Authorized
Representative: For purposes of this
policy, an Authorized Representative includes the Vice Chancellor for Business
Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, the Associate Vice Chancellor
for Finance, and the Director of Finance.
BMA
Index: The Bond Market Association
Municipal Swap Index, the principal benchmark for the floating rate payments
for tax-exempt issuers. The index is a
national rate based on a market basket of high-grade, seven-day, tax-exempt
variable rate bond issues.
Counterparty: A participant in a swap or other derivatives
agreement who exchanges payments based on interest rates or other criteria with
another counterparty.
Hedge: A transaction entered into to reduce
exposure to market fluctuations.
Interest Rate
Swap (or Swap): A transaction in which
two parties agree to exchange future net cash flows based on predetermined
interest rate indices calculated on an agreed notional amount. The swap is not a debt instrument and there is no exchange of principal.
ISDA Master
Agreement: The International Swaps
and Derivatives Association, Inc., is the global trade association for the
derivatives industry. The ISDA Master
Agreement is the basic governing document that serves as a framework for all
interest rate swap, swap enhancement, and derivative transactions between
two counterparties. It is a standard
form used throughout the industry. It
is typically negotiated once, prior to the first transaction, and remains
in force for all subsequent transactions.
LIBOR: The London Interbank Offered Rate. The rate of interest at which banks borrow
funds from other banks in the London interbank market. It is a commonly used benchmark for interest
rate transactions ranging from one month to one year.
Mark-to-Market: Calculation of the value of a financial
instrument (like an interest rate swap) based on the current market rates or
prices of the underlying indices.
Master
Resolution: The Amended and Restated
Master Resolution Establishing The University of Texas System Revenue Financing
System, adopted on February 14, 1991, amended on October 8, 1993 and August 14,
1997, and each supplemental resolution thereto authorizing parity debt.
Notional
Amount: The size of the interest rate
swap and the dollar amount used to calculate interest payments.
Last reviewed October 2003