The Online Magazine of The University of Texas System
UT Health Institutions Use Electronic Medical Records to Improve Patient Care and Safety
Why is it important that the UT health institutions invest in health information technology?
There are countless reasons why health information technology is beneficial to patients, doctors, nurses, staff
and our institutions. But, I don’t think there’s anything more crucial than improving the quality of medical care
and patient safety. I’ve been invested in a movement to reduce medical errors and improve safety for more than 40
years. When I was president of the Institute of Medicine, we released a report called "To Err Is Human: Building a
Safer Health System" in 1999 which raised awareness of safety issues on a national level. We found that 98,000
patients were dying every year due to preventable errors. I see health information technology as an incredible
tool to help us continue to combat this unfortunate reality. Electronic medical records (EMRs) enable everyone
in a patient’s care team to have the same, immediate access to a complete, up-to-date and accurate record of their
care. Patients can allow trusted family members to access their records and doctors can more easily collaborate
with other doctors responsible for a particular patient’s care. Future complications will be more easily predicted
and we can further embrace the concept of preventative care and stop issues before they occur. With so many people
who are invested in the patient’s well-being having the same real-time data, the chance for mistakes is drastically
reduced. Mistakes due to the poor legibility of handwriting will become a relic of the past and alerts that prompt
doctors to a patient’s drug allergies, possible harmful drug interactions and remind them to administer the
appropriate test at the right time also help minimize risk. The systems also allow doctors to analyze the outcomes
of patients under their care to ensure quality levels are being met. Finally, HIT systems will play a key role in
future medical research and will help our institutions collaborate with one another and other health providers
to uncover medical breakthroughs.
In addition to the benefits provided to patients, doctors and their staff, are there other advantages?
Errors come with associated costs, so their reduction translates into cost savings. And, the same measures health
information technology systems are using to reduce errors — access, alerts and reminders — will also help our
institutions cut costs while boosting efficiency and productivity. For example, repeated medical tests by
different doctors will be alleviated since the data will be available to all parties who need it, when they
need it. It also promotes much more efficient communication not only with doctors and nurses, but with administrative
staff. When patients submit questions online, they chose the appropriate category, such as appointments, billing,
insurance or prescriptions. The question is then routed to the appropriate staff. In addition to improving customer
service by providing faster and better answers, this has also increased productivity as staff don’t have to field
questions that fall outside their area of expertise as often. Also, our reliance on paper will be diminished. Our
institutions won’t have to dedicate nearly as much space to record-keeping and can use it for other purposes. The
cost of electronic storage is much less than for paper records. And, because of the sheer volume of data, productivity
will increase as staff will be able to much more easily and quickly locate needed information. Even after a
patient’s file was found before, the one piece of needed information may have been checked out. In fact, patient
records might have been stored at different locations. Bringing them together for a complete review often required
copying, faxing or transporting the documents. These activities are time-consuming, resource-intensive, complicated
and expensive. With an EMR system, all needed records can be accessed from anywhere in the world, by all authorized
parties.
Do you see any challenges?
With so much information being exchanged electronically, naturally there are concerns about security and
privacy. Fortunately, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) established
rules to protect the privacy and security of electronic information. All electronic medical record messaging
is encrypted from end-to-end, ensuring that sensitive communications are secure. Our experts in the area,
such as Kirk Kirksey at UT Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas, assert that EMRs are actually much safer than paper records because
of the encryption, monitoring systems and the policies and procedures that are in place. The systems also
include various security levels so that only authorized people can see particular patient records. For example,
doctors can only see their own patients. Compare this to a paper-based system where folders of sensitive
information could potentially be laying out for unrestricted people to see. A larger issue may actually be
physician adoption. These systems not only change the way doctors work, but also the work processes and
procedures in their offices. It also changes the dynamic in the room with patients. And, many pieces of medical
equipment now include an interface that allows doctors to enter notes and findings instead of making a
handwritten note in a paper file. That data then feeds into the patient’s electronic medical record. Physicians
are obviously very busy people and many have been working with paper-based systems for many years, with a high
level of success. Taking the time to learn a new system and make a dramatic change can be difficult. But, the ones
who do make the transition are finding it incredibly beneficial and we’re confident that word will spread.
How does the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 impact UT institution health information technology efforts?
The act allocates billions of dollars to help physicians and hospitals acquire and implement health
information technology across the United States. That gives evidence, in no uncertain terms, that it
is at the forefront of the national health care agenda. In fact, the federal government has an
ambitious goal of an electronic health record for every person in the United States by 2014. This national
support gives our UT institutions even more incentive to continue the expansion of their HIT programs.
For example, UT Health Science Center – Houston (UTHealth-Houston) recently secured two federal stimulus grants
totaling $30.3 million. One of the grants provided $15.3 million to establish the new Gulf Coast
Regional Extension Center. Part of a network of regional extension centers across the country, it will
enable UTHealth-Houston to improve the quality of health care in our state by providing community-based
primary care physicians and other health care practitioners training, technical assistance, guidance
and information on best practices to accelerate the adoption and meaningful use of electronic medical
records. The second grant is valued at $15 million and establishes a National Center for Cognitive
Informatics and Decision Making in Healthcare. Collaborating with other institutions, the center will
work to make health information technology systems easy and inviting to use. In order to achieve
widespread adoption, by both patients and health care providers, this is essential. After all,
implementation of the systems won’t do any good if they are not used.
(Read more about the grants.) This is just the beginning of a sea
change and the UT health institutions are leading the way.
Dr. Kenneth I. Shine, Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs.
Health Information Technology for the Future of Health and Care
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website providing information about HIT and programs being implemented to spur its adoption nationwide.
Recovery.gov
U.S. government website dedicated to outlining the use of funds from The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. One of the act's long-term investment goals is "…to computerize health records to reduce medical errors and save on health-care costs."
Copyright © 2010 The University of Texas System. All rights reserved.