|
UT System Administration Policy Library -- Policy INT101
Discipline/Dismissal of Employees |
Responsible Officer: Assistant Vice Chancellor for Employee Services
Sponsoring Office: Office of Employee Services
Effective Date: February 1, 2001
Last Reviewed: April 7, 2008
Next Scheduled Review: July 1, 2009
Errors or changes to: policyoffice@utsystem.edu
CONTENTS
Policy Statement
Rationale
Scope
Website Address For This Policy
Related Policies, Requirements Or Standards
Contacts
Definitions
Responsibilities
Procedures
Forms Tools/Online Processes
Appendix
POLICY STATEMENT
These policies and procedures are applicable to conduct or job performance of a classified employee that results in a decision to impose a disciplinary penalty of demotion, suspension without pay, or dismissal.
Disciplinary actions will be based only on job-related performance or conduct. Any disciplinary action taken will be without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, veteran status, sexual orientation, age or disability.
RATIONALE
It is the policy of The University of Texas System Administration to encourage fair, efficient and equitable solutions for problems arising out of the employment relationship and to meet the requirements of state and federal law.
SCOPE
All Offices of UT System Administration
WEBSITE ADDRESS FOR THIS POLICY
http://www.utsystem.edu/policy/policies/int101.html
RELATED STATUTES, POLICIES, REQUIREMENTS OR STANDARDS
CONTACTS
If you have any questions about UT System Administration Policy INT 101, Discipline/Dismissal of Employees, contact the following offices:
Subject |
Office Name |
Telephone Number
|
Email/URL |
Human Resources/ Employee Benefits |
Office of Employee Services |
512-499-4587 |
esc@utsystem.edu |
None
RESPONSIBILITIES
Employee
- Expected to acquaint himself or herself with performance criteria for his or her particular job and with all rules, procedures, and standards of conduct established by the U.T. System Board of Regents.
- Expected to maintain satisfactory work performance standards and standards of conduct suitable and acceptable to the work environment.
- Must follow process provided to appeal disciplinary demotion, suspension without pay, or termination.
Supervisor
- Takes appropriate disciplinary action when the work performance of an employee is below standard or for unacceptable conduct of an employee.
- Investigates all incidents that involve the potential for disciplinary action.
- Investigates all incidents that involve the potential for disciplinary action, outlined in procedures 2.3 - 2.5 of this policy.
Vice Chancellor, Executive Vice Chancellor, or Administrative Equivalent
- Hears the appeal or appoints a delegate to hear the appeal and provides a written decision to the employee after the close of the hearing.
PROCEDURES
This policy does not apply to:
1.1 institutional police, faculty or teaching staff who are subject to other approved discipline or dismissal procedures;
1.2 suspension with pay pending investigation of allegations relating to an employee;
1.3 decisions not to offer reappointment to persons whose appointment for a stated period of one year or less expires at the end of such period without the necessity of notice of non-renewal as provided in the Rules and Regulations of the U. T. System Board of Regents or the rules and regulations of the institution; or
1.2 Dismissal of employees:
1.2.1 who are appointed to positions without fixed term and, under applicable rule or regulation, serve at the pleasure of a specific administrative officer;
1.2.2 who occupy positions that are dependent upon funding from a specific source and such funding is not received;
1.2.3 as a result of a re-organization;
1.2.4 because of financial exigency;
1.2.5 during a six-month probationary period;
1.2.6 who are appointed for a stated period that is less than six months; or
1.2.7 who are appointed at a per diem or hourly rate and work on an as-needed basis.
2. DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE
2.1 Requisite Standards of Conduct
Each employee is expected to acquaint themselves with performance criteria for their particular job and with all rules, procedures, and standards of conduct established by the U.T. System Board of Regents, the institution and the employee’s department or unit. An employee who does not fulfill the responsibilities set out by such performance criteria, rules, procedures, and standards of conduct may be subject to adverse personnel action.
2.2 Conduct Which is Subject to Disciplinary Action
2.2.1 Work Performance
a) Failure of an employee to maintain satisfactory work performance standards can constitute good cause for disciplinary action including dismissal. The term “work performance” includes all aspects of an employee’s work.
b) Work performance is to be judged by the supervisor’s evaluation of the quality and quantity of work performed by each employee. When, in the opinion of the supervisor, the work performance of an employee is below standard, the supervisor should take appropriate disciplinary action.
2.2.2 Misconduct
a) All employees are expected to maintain standards of conduct suitable and acceptable to the work environment. Disciplinary action, including dismissal, may be imposed for unacceptable conduct.
b) Examples of unacceptable conduct include, but are not limited to:
(1) falsification of time sheets, personnel records, or other institutional records;
(2) neglect of duties or wasting time during work hours;
(3) smoking anywhere except in designated smoking areas;
(4) gambling, participating in lotteries, or any other games of chance on the premises at any time;
(5) soliciting, collecting money, or circulating petitions on the premises other than within the rules and regulations of the institution;
(6) bringing intoxicants or drugs onto the premises of the institution,
using intoxicants or drugs, having intoxicants or drugs in one’s possession, or being under the influence of intoxicants or drugs on the premises at any time;
(7) abuse or waste of tools, equipment, fixtures, property, supplies, or goods of the institution;
(8) creating or contributing to unhealthy or unsanitary conditions;
(9) violations of safety rules or accepted safety practices;
(10) failure to cooperate with supervisor or co-worker, impairment of function of work unit, or disruptive conduct;
(11) disorderly conduct, harassment of other employees (including sexual harassment), or use of abusive language on the premises;
(12) fighting, encouraging a fight, or threatening, attempting or causing injury to another person on the premises;
(13) neglect of duty or failure to meet a reasonable and objective measure of efficiency and productivity;
(14) theft, dishonesty, or unauthorized use of institutional property including records and confidential information;
(15) creating conditions hazardous to another person on the premises;
(16) destroying or defacing institutional property or records, or the property of a student or employee;
(17) refusal of an employee to follow instructions or to perform designated work that may be required of an employee, or refusal to adhere to established rules and regulations;
(18) repeated tardiness or absence, absence without proper notification to the supervisor or without satisfactory reason, failure to report for work or to make appropriate contact with the supervisor to report an absence from work, or unavailability for work; and
(19) violation of policies or rules of the institution or The University of Texas System.
2.3 Investigations
2.3.1 All incidents that involve the potential for disciplinary action shall be investigated by the employee’s supervisor or other designated administrative official.
2.3.2 If the investigation results in evidence that establishes with reasonable certainty that the employee engaged in conduct which warrants a disciplinary penalty of demotion, suspension without pay, or dismissal, the supervisor shall follow the pre-disciplinary procedures.
2.4 Pre-disciplinary Procedures
2.4.1 Policy
a) The supervisor will review the evidence and proposed disciplinary action with the director of human resources, or his or her delegate, and will obtain the approval of the appropriate department head or administrative equivalent before proceeding with the proposed discipline.
b) An employee shall be informed of the basis for any proposed disciplinary action resulting in demotion, suspension without pay, or dismissal and have an opportunity to respond before a final decision is made to take disciplinary action. This process serves as an opportunity to avoid mistaken decisions to impose discipline and is not intended to definitively resolve the propriety of the disciplinary action being considered.
2.4.2 Process
There is no prescribed form for this process; it should be informal. However, before reaching a final decision to impose discipline, the supervisor shall:
a) inform the employee, either in person or in writing, of the intention to seek disciplinary action and the reasons for the proposed disciplinary action, the facts upon which the supervisor relies, the names of any persons who have made statements about the disciplinary incident, and the content of such statements;
b) give the employee access to any documentary material upon which the supervisor has relied; and
c) give the employee an opportunity to respond to the charges either orally or in writing within a reasonable time and to persuade the supervisor that the evidence supporting the charges is not true.
The supervisor will review the employee’s response, if any, with the human resources director, or his or her delegate, and will obtain the final approval of the appropriate department head or administrative equivalent before proceeding to impose the disciplinary penalty, if any.
2.5 Imposing the Disciplinary Penalty
2.5.1 Notice
Upon completing the pre-disciplinary procedures, the supervisor shall inform the employee in writing of the following:
a) whether the disciplinary penalty is demotion, suspension without pay, or dismissal;
b) the effective date of demotion, suspension without pay, or dismissal;
c) a specific period for a suspension without pay, not to exceed five work days. Employees who are exempted from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act may only be suspended without pay for a period of an entire work week;
d) the specific incident, conduct, course of conduct, unsatisfactory work performance, or other basis for the disciplinary penalty;
e) any previous efforts to make the employee aware of the need to change or improve work performance or conduct; and
f) reference to any relevant rule, regulation, or policy.
The supervisor shall also inform the employee of the right to appeal the disciplinary action and provide the employee with a copy of the appeal procedure.
2.5.2 Effect Upon Employee Benefits
a) An employee who is demoted or suspended without pay continues to accrue vacation and sick leave, to be covered by group insurance, and to be entitled to other employee benefit programs.
b) If a demotion or suspension without pay is appealed and it is determined that there was not good cause for the demotion or suspension, the employee shall be entitled to payment for wages lost as a result of the demotion or suspension.
c) If it is determined upon appeal that a dismissal was not for good cause, the employee shall be reinstated to the same or similar position and shall be entitled to payment of back wages less any unemployment benefits received by the employee after the date of dismissal. Employee benefits such as vacation and sick leave shall be credited back to the date of dismissal.
3. PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
Disciplinary actions resulting in dismissal, suspension without pay, or demotion may be appealed by the affected employee pursuant to the process set forth below. The time limits set forth in the appeal procedure must be adhered to by both the employee and the appropriate supervisory and administrative personnel unless extended for good cause by the human resources director. The failure of the employee to process the appeal in a timely manner to the next level shall constitute a withdrawal of the appeal. The failure of supervisory or administrative personnel to respond in a timely manner to an appeal shall constitute authorization for the employee to process the appeal to the next step.
3.1 Step One
The employee may present a written appeal to the department head or administrative equivalent within five workdays from the date of the disciplinary action. The appeal shall contain a clear and concise statement of why the disciplinary action is inappropriate. Within ten workdays of the date of the appeal, a written decision shall be mailed to the employee.
3.2 Step Two
If the employee is not satisfied with the step one decision, the employee may present a written request for a hearing before the appropriate vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent for the employee’s department. The request for a hearing must state clearly why the disciplinary action was inappropriate and/or why the one decision should be changed. The request must be made within five workdays following the date of the appealed decision. The vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent shall, at his or her discretion, either hear the appeal in person or appoint a delegate(s) to hear the appeal. The hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the procedure set out in Paragraph 4.5 below.
3.3 Step Three
If the employee is not satisfied with the step two decision, a written appeal may be made to the chancellor within five workdays of the date of step two decision and must state why such decision is incorrect. The review by the chancellor shall be based solely upon the step two record and shall not include any new issue or evidence. Within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty days following the date of the appeal, a written decision will be mailed to the employee. The decision by the chancellor is final.
3.4 Records of Disciplinary Actions
Copies of all documents pertaining to disciplinary actions shall be filed in the employee’s personnel file.
3.5 Step Two Hearing Procedures
3.5.1 Pre-Hearing Rules and Procedures
a) Naming the Delegate(s)
If the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent elects to appoint a delegate(s) to hear the appeal, the name or names will be furnished to the employee as soon as practical after the selection is made. If more than one person is appointed, one of such persons shall be designated to serve as chair in the notice to the employee.
b) Challenges to Impartiality
An employee may challenge the fairness and impartiality of the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent or an appointed delegate(s). The challenge must be in writing and must clearly state the factual basis for the challenge. A challenge of the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent must be made within five days of the date of the request for a hearing and a challenge of a delegate(s) must be made within five days after the date of the notice appointing the delegate(s). It shall be up to the person challenged to determine whether he or she can serve with fairness and impartiality. If the challenged vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent determines that he or she cannot be fair and impartial in the consideration of the appeal, he or she shall appoint a delegate(s) to hear the appeal. If a challenged delegate(s) determines that he or she cannot be fair and impartial in the consideration of the appeal, the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent shall appoint another delegate(s).
c) Time Limits
The hearing shall be conducted as soon as practical, but not later than twenty workdays following the date of the appeal or the appointment of delegate(s).
d) Discovery Rights and Document Exchange
(1) The employee may request institutional documents, records or exhibits. Such request must accompany the step two written appeal. The requested records will be furnished if, in the opinion of the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent or the designated chair, as the case may be, they are relevant to the appeal and are not made confidential by law.
(2) At least five days prior to the time set for the hearing, the institutional representative for the appeal and the employee shall furnish each other with the names of the witnesses to be called, a summary of their expected testimony and a copy of each document, record or exhibit to be introduced at the hearing.
3.5.2 Hearing Rules and Procedures
a) Role of Hearing Chair
(1) The vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent or the delegate designated as chair shall preside at the hearing and ensure the order of presentation as well as decide on questions of relevancy. The chair shall also have the discretion to determine the form and scope of cross-examination allowed during the hearing.
(2) Upon request, the chair may consult with and be advised by counsel during the hearing.
b) Right to Representation
The employee has the right to be represented at the hearing by an attorney or other individual representative. If the employee is represented by an attorney or an individual from an employee organization that does not claim the right to strike, the institution may be represented by an attorney from the Office of General Counsel of The University of Texas System.
c) Hearing Record
In all appeal hearings, a record of the proceedings shall be made.
At the discretion of the institution, either a tape recording shall be made or a court reporter shall be furnished by the institution to transcribe the hearing and swear in witnesses. When a court reporter is furnished, the party requesting a copy of the transcript of the proceedings shall be responsible for its cost. When tape recorded, the institution shall tape the hearing and make a copy of the tape available to the employee on request. The transcript of the court reporter or the tape of the proceedings shall be the official record of the hearing.
d) Burden of Proof
The institution has the burden of proving by a preponderance of credible evidence that good cause exists for the disciplinary action and, therefore, shall have the right to open and close the proceedings.
e) Order of Presentation and Right to Cross-Examination
(1) The hearing shall consist of opening statements on behalf of the institution and the employee and testimony by witnesses called by the institution and the employee, with both parties having the right to cross-examine witnesses and make closing statements.
(2) Relevant exhibits may be introduced by either party and the chair shall take notice of the employee’s personnel record.
f) Institutional Employees as Witnesses
(1) Any employee can be asked to appear as a witness for either party.
(2) It shall be the duty of an employee requested to testify to do so as to any facts which may be relevant to the appeal.
3.5.3 Post-Hearing Rules and Procedures
a) The delegate(s) shall deliberate, prepare, and forward written findings and recommendations to the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent within ten workdays after the close of the hearing.
b) The vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent shall mail his or her decision to the employee within ten workdays following the receipt of the findings and recommendations from the delegate(s).
c) If the vice chancellor, executive vice chancellor, or administrative equivalent has heard the appeal, he or she shall mail a written decision to the employee within ten workdays after the close of the hearing.
FORMS AND TOOLS/ONLINE PROCESSES
None
APPENDIX
None
keywords: disciplinary action, performance criteria, misconduct, suspension, dismissal, firing, fire, termination
