Printable Policy

 

UTS119 - Institutional Compliance Program

 

  

Seal of the University of Texas

 

 

UT System Administration Policy Library -- Policy UTS119

Institutional Compliance Program

 

Responsible Officer: The Chancellor
Sponsoring Office: Systemwide Compliance Office
Effective Date: February 12, 2002
Last Reviewed: October 21, 2009
Next Scheduled Review: November 1, 2011
Errors or changes to: policyoffice@utsystem.edu




CONTENTS

 



Policy Statement

Rationale
Scope
Website Address For This Policy
Related Statutes, Policies, Requirements Or Standards
Contacts
Definitions
Responsibilities
Procedures

Forms Tools/Online Processes

Appendix


POLICY STATEMENT

 


 

The University of Texas Institutional Compliance Program is documented in the Action Plan to Ensure Institutional Compliance (Action Plan) approved by the Chancellor and presented to the Business Affairs and Audit Committee of the Board of Regents on April 24, 1998. 


RATIONALE

 



A pro-active program to maximize compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, policies and procedures became an essential part of every organization's internal control infrastructure after the passage of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Sentencing Guidelines).


SCOPE

 



All institutions and UT System Administration 


WEBSITE ADDRESS FOR THIS POLICY

 



http://www.utsystem.edu/policy/policies/uts119.html


RELATED POLICIES, REQUIREMENTS OR STANDARDS

 


 

UT System Administration  Policies & Standards

Other Policies & Standards

 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACTS

 


If you have any questions about UT System Administration Policy UTS 119, Institutional Compliance Program, contact the following offices:

 

Subject

Office Name

Telephone Number

Email/URL

 

Systemwide Compliance Office

(512) 579-5096

http://www.utsystem.edu/compliance/


DEFINITIONS  

 


None


RESPONSIBILITIES 

 


 

UT System Administration   

  • Has an institutional compliance mission statement modeled after the Systemwide mission statement.
  • Determines the appropriate compliance infrastructure and policies and procedures.

UT System Institution      

  • Has an institutional compliance mission statement modeled after the Systemwide mission statement.
  • Determines the appropriate compliance infrastructure and policies and procedures.

Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee

  • Oversees and directs the Systemwide compliance function. 
  • Meets quarterly.

PROCEDURES  

 


           
A mission statement, including Goals and Objectives, for the program (Exhibit A) has been developed to reflect the requirements of the Sentencing Guidelines.

 

System Administration and each institution must have an institutional compliance mission statement modeled after the Systemwide mission statement.


System Administration and each institution have the authority to determine the appropriate compliance infrastructure and policies and procedures for their respective institutions.

Responsibility and accountability of the parties in the Institutional Compliance Infrastructure are detailed in the Action Plan and are reproduced in The Responsibility and Accountability for Compliance (Exhibit B).

 

The Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee provides oversight and direction for the Systemwide compliance function. The Committee is comprised of the Chancellor, the Executive Vice Chancellors for Business Affairs, Health Affairs, and Academic Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, the General Counsel to the Board of Regents, the Vice Chancellor for Administration, the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology Transfer, and the Systemwide Compliance Officer. The Chancellor is the chairman of this Committee. The Committee meets on a quarterly basis.


FORMS AND TOOLS/ONLINE PROCESSES

 


None


APPENDIX

 


Exhibit A


Mission Statement

The University of Texas System endeavors to fulfill all of its responsibilities to the people of Texas in an environment based upon ethical behavior and compliance with applicable laws and rules.

Goals

 

The Institutional Compliance Program shall provide:

  • Assurance that all faculty and staff are aware of their duties and responsibilities in establishing and sustaining that environment; and
  • A mechanism for continuously assessing the effectiveness of that environment in assuring that all UT System business is conducted with integrity.

Objectives

 

1. An Institutional Compliance infrastructure shall be established at System Administration and each institution that must include:

  • A Compliance Officer
  • A Compliance Committee
  • A Compliance Office, if appropriate for the organization.

2. Each segment of the compliance infrastructure, as indicated in number 1 above, shall have its own duties and responsibilities.


3. System Administration and each institution shall develop and annually update a Risk-Based Compliance Plan that must include the following sections for each 'high-risk' area:

  • Responsible Party
  • Monitoring Plan
  • Specialized Training Plan

4. The Systemwide Compliance Officer shall establish a reporting mechanism to provide information as appropriate on the status of the Institutional Compliance Program at System Administration and each institution. Copies of the periodic reports shall be compiled by the Systemwide Compliance Officer and distributed to the Board of Regents and Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee.


5. The Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee shall provide guidance and oversight of the Systemwide Compliance Function. This Committee consists of the Chancellor, the Executive Vice Chancellors for Business Affairs, Health Affairs, and Academic Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, the General Counsel to the Board of Regents, the Vice Chancellor for Administration, the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology Transfer, and the Systemwide Compliance Officer. The Chancellor serves as chair of this group.


6. System Administration and each institution shall have a network of monitoring, reporting, and training methods to maximize compliance.


7. Employees at System Administration and each institution shall be provided compliance-related training and information to ensure understanding of their duties and responsibilities for ethical and legal behavior.


8. Responsible parties at every level of System Administration and each institution shall be held accountable for their failure to act ethically and in compliance with applicable laws and rules.

 

Exhibit B - The Responsibility and Accountability for Compliance

  • The Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee is responsible for providing oversight and guidance to the Systemwide compliance function.
  • Employees of System Administration and institutions are responsible for compliance with laws, regulations, and policies and procedures and will be held accountable for their actions.
  • The Systemwide Compliance Officer is responsible and shall be held accountable for apprising the Chancellor and the Board of Regents of the institutional compliance functions and activities at System Administration and each institution. The Systemwide Compliance Officer is also responsible for bringing institutional compliance matters at System Administration and each institution to the Systemwide Executive Compliance Committee.
  • The Institutional Compliance Officer at System Administration and each institution is responsible and shall be held accountable for implementing and operating a risk-based process that:
    (1) builds compliance consciousness into daily business processes,
    (2) monitors the effectiveness of the processes,
    (3) communicates instances of non-compliance to appropriate administrative officers for action, and
    (4) provides the Systemwide Compliance Officer with quarterly activity reports.
  • The Institutional Compliance Committee at System Administration and each institution is responsible and shall be held accountable for providing advice and guidance to the Compliance Officer and to the Chief Administrative Officer on the design and operation of the institutional compliance program.
  • The department head of each operating unit within System Administration and each institution is responsible and shall be held accountable for compliance and compliance-related activities in their respective units.
  • The Chancellor and each Chief Administrative Officer is responsible and shall be held accountable at their respective institutions for:
    (1) the sufficiency of resources allocated to compliance activities, and
    (2) the appropriateness of corrective and disciplinary action taken in the event of noncompliance.
  • In accordance with UTS129, Internal Audit Activities, Internal Audit may provide consulting and assurance services, as necessary and appropriate, to the compliance operations at System Administration and each institution.
  • Internal Audit is responsible and shall be held accountable for:
    (1) independently evaluating the design and effectiveness of the compliance function at System Administration and each institution, and
    (2) making recommendations for improvements, as necessary and appropriate.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

keywords: compliance, ethics

 


  • © 2008 The University of Texas System
  • 702 Colorado Street, Suite 6.200
  • Austin, Texas 78701
  • Phone: (512) 499-4744
  •