Page title

Best Practices Regarding University-Affiliated Foundation Relationships

Main page content

Document Description

In November 2012, the Board of Regents Chairman Wm. Eugene Powell established the Task Force to “assure that relationships between the U. T. System institutions and the U. T. System and affiliated foundations are optimally structured to serve as a national model for public universities for the best management, compliance, and oversight practices.”

For the purposes of this review, university-affiliated foundations are defined as Texas nonprofit trusts or corporations whose sole, primary, or operationally significant purpose is to provide financial support to a U. T. System institution (see Appendix A for the complete list of foundations affiliated with University of Texas System institutions considered in this review).

In accordance with the Chairman’s charge (see Appendix B), the Task Force included in its research and deliberations identification of best practices in seven key areas of university-foundation management, including:

  1. Best structures for affiliated foundations/university interactions and reporting.
  2. Ideal location of and staffing for foundation offices.
  3. Methods for requesting, record-keeping, and provision of funding for university support to assure no impermissible direct benefits to U. T. employees.
  4. Overlaps in foundation and university fundraising.
  5. Compliance with current legal requirements concerning conflicts of interest and tax issues.6. Ways to enhance delineation of university and foundation activities to reduce confusion or ambiguity.

The Task Force’s recommendations for best practices are guided by the following findings and principles:

  1. A workable model for university-affiliated foundation relationships requires a shared vision endorsed by the U. T. System, U. T. institutions, and affiliated foundations.
  2. The unique and historically significant contributions of each university-affiliated foundation should be acknowledged and respected.
  3. Independent governance and clear separation of services/duties between university-affiliated foundations and their supported universities should be preserved.
  4. Operational redundancies between university-affiliated foundations and their supported universities should be reduced or eliminated.
  5. Full transparency in the relationship between each university and its university-affiliated foundations is essential.
  6. Donor intent must be honored by the university and the university-affiliated foundation throughout the life of every donor gift.
  7. Periodic assessment of the role of each university-affiliated foundation and the relationship with the institution supported is necessary periodically and as circumstances change.


Release Date

Responsible Office(s)

Board of Regents

Document Type

Board of Regents
Task Force Reports